Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a potential prognostic factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Author information

Affiliations

  • 1. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
      Authors
    • Cen RX 1
    (1 author)
  • 2. Department of Pathology, Huangshi Central Hospital of Edong Healthcare Group, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi, Hubei, China.
      Authors
    • Li YG 2
    (1 author)

Medicine, 01 Sep 2019, 98(38):e17176
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017176 PMID: 31567957 PMCID: PMC6756635

Review

This article is in the Europe PMC Open access subset. Refer to the copyright information in the article for licensing details.
Free full text in Europe PMC

Abstract 

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as a prognostic marker in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

A literature search was conducted using online databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WangFang. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinicopathological features were generated and compared.

Results

Ten studies that included 3388 patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Among them, 8 studies with 3033 patients with NPC investigated the prognostic role of PLR for OS and showed that elevated PLR was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.46-2.15, P < .001). Five studies that included 1156 patients investigated the role of PLR in predicting PFS, and showed that high PLR was associated with poor PFS (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.26-2.17, P < .001). Moreover, high PLR correlated with the N stage (N2-3 vs N0-1; OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.02-2.34, P = .04).

Conclusion

Our study suggested that high PLR is associated with worse prognosis in patients with NPC. Pretreatment PLR could serve as a simple, promising indicator for prognostic evaluation in patients with NPC.

Free full text 

Logo of medicineHomeSearchSubmit a ManuscriptMedicine
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep; 98(38): e17176.
Published online 2019 Sep 20. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017176
PMCID: PMC6756635
PMID: 31567957

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a potential prognostic factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

A meta-analysis
Rui-Xiang Cen, MDa and Yu-Gang Li, MDb,*
Monitoring Editor: Yan Li.
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Abstract

Background:

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as a prognostic marker in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods:

A literature search was conducted using online databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WangFang. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinicopathological features were generated and compared.

Results:

Ten studies that included 3388 patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Among them, 8 studies with 3033 patients with NPC investigated the prognostic role of PLR for OS and showed that elevated PLR was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.46–2.15, P < .001). Five studies that included 1156 patients investigated the role of PLR in predicting PFS, and showed that high PLR was associated with poor PFS (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.26–2.17, P < .001). Moreover, high PLR correlated with the N stage (N2-3 vs N0-1; OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.02–2.34, P = .04).

Conclusion:

Our study suggested that high PLR is associated with worse prognosis in patients with NPC. Pretreatment PLR could serve as a simple, promising indicator for prognostic evaluation in patients with NPC.

Keywords: meta-analysis, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, prognosis

1. Introduction

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a malignant tumor derived from nasopharyngeal epithelium, is one of the most common head and neck cancers in south China and southeast Asia.[1] Due to its anatomical location and radiosensitivity, radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy remains the standard treatment.[2] With the wide application and progress of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technology, the nasopharyngeal lesion control rate increased significantly.[3] Due to the onset of deep location, early diagnosis is difficult, and 5% to 6% patients have had distant metastasis at the time of presentation.[4] Although the combination of chemotherapy, targeted drug therapy, and surgical treatment has improved the prognosis of patients to some extent, the overall effect remains unsatisfactory.[5,6] Therefore, a better understanding of the carcinogenic mechanisms and the use of ideal cancer biomarkers is required to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with NPC.

Cancer-associated inflammation has been reported to increase the risk of tumor development and angiogenesis.[7] The tumor-associated inflammatory response consists of inflammatory cells and a range of inflammatory mediators.[8] Recently, inflammation-based models such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) have been developed to predict oncological outcomes in various solid cancers.[9–11] As a new inflammation-based scoring index, a combination of lymphocyte and platelet count has been recently reported. PLR has been widely investigated for its value in predicting the prognosis of patients with NPC[12,13]; however, it has not been fully elucidated. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the relationship of PLR with the prognosis and clinicopathology of patients with NPC.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Search strategies

Relevant studies were selected using the online databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WanFang. Search terms were confined to the following main words and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: “PLR” or “platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio” or “platelet to lymphocyte ratio” or “platelet lymphocyte ratio”, and “nasopharyngeal cancer” or “nasopharyngeal carcinoma” or “nasopharyngeal tumor” or “nasopharyngeal neoplasms.” The literature search was conducted from inception of this study to February 10, 2019. All analyses were based on previous published studies. Thus, this study did not require ethic approval or informed consent.

2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The criteria for inclusion were as follows:

  • 1.

    Studies reporting the association between pretreatment PLR, prognosis, or clinicopathological features in NPC;

  • 2.

    Studies where PLR was assessed by cut-off value or median into different risk strata; and

  • 3.

    studies that provided sufficient information for extraction or calculation of the individual hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI).

The criteria for exclusion of studies were as follows:

  • 1.

    lack of appropriate data that could be extracted or calculated,

  • 2.

    duplicate publications, and

  • 3.

    reviews, meta-analysis, letters, and conference abstracts.

2.3. Data extraction

Two reviewers independently reviewed articles for inclusion/exclusion criteria. The following information was extracted: the first author name, publication year, country, age, number of patients, sex, tumor stage (non-metastatic and metastatic), TNM stage, treatment type (chemotherapy and combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy), cut-off value, follow-up duration, and survival outcome.

2.4. Quality assessment

In this meta-analysis, the quality assessment for non-randomized studies was evaluated by two reviewers independently based on the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS).[14] Based on this scale, studies are awarded a maximum score of 9 points; studies with NOS values greater than 6 are considered high quality studies.

2.5. Statistical analysis

HRs with corresponding 95% CIs were used to estimate the association of PLR with NPC survival rates. In this meta-analysis, the HRs and 95% CIs were directly extracted if a study reported the survival analysis; otherwise, they were computed from the Kaplan–Meier graph using Engauge Digitizer software (version 4.1).[15,16] Statistical heterogeneity was quantified by I2 statistic. A random effects model was used[17] with prominent heterogeneity (I2 > 50% or P for heterogeneity < 0.10) and contrast (I2 < 50% and P for heterogeneity > .10), and a fixed effects model was also adopted Stata 13.0 (StataCorp, College station, TX). We performed a sensitivity analysis in order to validate the robustness of the pooled results by removing each study. The risk of publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of Begg funnel plot and Egger's linear regression test.[18,19]P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Study selection

The literature search identified 42 records: 10, 22, 2, and 8 from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wan Fang, respectively. As shown in the flow diagram (Fig. ​(Fig.1),1), 28 records were retained after excluding duplicate studies. The titles and abstracts were then screened and 13 articles were removed as irrelevant. Fifteen full-text articles remained for further assessment, 5 of which were excluded after not meeting the inclusion criteria. In total, 10 studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis.[20–29]

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g001.jpg

Flow diagram showing the study retrieval and selection process.

3.2. Study characteristics

All included studies were conducted in China and published between 2015 and 2018. There were 9 studies that reported non-metastatic disease, and 1 study that reported metastatic disease. Most patients were treated with radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Of the 10 studies, four reported HRs both for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), 4 reported the HR for OS, and 1 reported the HR for PFS. In addition, prognostic data on OS or PFS were directly retrieved from 8 studies. PLR cut-off values ranged from 108.33–174, and studies with NOS scores ranging from 6 to 9 stars were regarded as high-quality studies. The detailed characteristics of the eligible articles are presented in Table ​Table11.

Table 1

Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g002.jpg

4. Meta-analysis

4.1. PLR and overall survival

As shown in Table ​Table2,2, 8 studies with 3033 patients were used to investigate the role of PLR in predicting OS of patients with NPC. The pooled results showed that elevated PLR was associated worse prognosis (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.46–2.15, P < .001, Fig. ​Fig.2).2). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was performed to further explore the prognostic value of PLR in NPC (Table ​(Table2).2). The results demonstrated that elevated PLR predicted worse OS in patients with non-metastatic disease (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.46–2.19; P < .001). However, no prognostic value was observed in patients with metastatic disease (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.87–3.00, P = .128). Similarly, a significant relationship was detected between high PLR and shorter OS in patients who received a combination treatment (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.26–3.31; P < .001). Moreover, the sample size, cut-off for PLR, and analysis method did not affect the significant predictive value of PLR in patients with NPC.

Table 2

Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for OS according to subgroup analyses.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g003.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g004.jpg

Pooled HR of PLR for OS in patients with NPC. HR = hazard ratio, NPC = nasopharyngeal carcinoma, OS = overall survival, PLR = Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.

4.2. PLR and progression-free survival

The association between high PLR and progression-free survival (PFS) has been reported in Figure ​Figure3.3. The analysis showed a HR of 1.65, with 95% CI: 1.26–2.17, which indicated a significantly negative association between PLR and PFS (Fig. ​(Fig.33).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g005.jpg

Pooled HR of PLR for PFS in patients with NPC. HR = hazard ratio, NPC = nasopharyngeal carcinoma, PFS = progression-free survival, PLR = Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.

4.3. PLR and clinicopathological characteristics

Our results demonstrated that high PLR was related to N stage (N2–3 vs N0–1; OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.02–2.34, P = .04). However, no obvious association was found between the PLR and sex (male vs female; OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.63–1.48, P = .86), age (> median vs < median; OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.79–1.77, P = .40), TNM stage (III-IV vs I-II; OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.51–2.05, P = .94), and T stage (T3-4 vs T1-2; OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 0.75–6.13, P = .16).

4.4. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

To test the stability of the meta-analysis of LMR, OS, and PFS, a sensitivity analysis was performed. The results showed that our meta-analysis was steady, since pooled HRs did not alter significantly after eliminating the included studies in sequence (Figs. ​(Figs.44 and ​and5).5). As shown in Figures ​Figures66 and ​and7,7, there was no significant publication bias in both OS (P = .216 for Begg test) and PFS (P = 1.000 for Begg test).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g006.jpg

Sensitivity analysis of PLR on OS in patients with NPC. NPC = nasopharyngeal carcinoma, OS = overall survival, PLR = Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g007.jpg

Sensitivity analysis of PLR on PFS in patients with NPC. NPC = nasopharyngeal carcinoma, PFS = progression-free survival, PLR = Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g008.jpg

Begg funnel plot of publication bias test for OS in patients with NPC. NPC = nasopharyngeal carcinoma, OS = overall survival.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is medi-98-e17176-g009.jpg

Begg funnel plot of publication bias test for PFS in patients with NPC. NPC = nasopharyngeal carcinoma, PFS = progression-free survival.

5. Discussion

Inflammation has previously been recognized as an important factor in the development of tumors in humans.[7,30,31] PLR has been considered as an accurate, readily obtained, and low-cost indicator for evaluating patient status and prognosis that allows patients and physicians make accurate treatment decisions prior to clinical intervention. Here, we performed a meta-analysis, including 10 studies that included 3388 patients with NPC to evaluate the prognostic value of PLR on OS and PFS. According to the pooled results, there was a significant correlation of high PLR with poor survival of patients with NPC. The subgroup analyses maintained the significant prognostic effect of PLR on OS and PFS for NPC. Moreover, high PLR was associated advanced N stage. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because prognostic biomarkers are highly needed to guide the proper management of patients with NPC and improve their outcomes. PLR provides a potential new prognostic biomarker for cancer control that will help counteract the burden of this disease.

Although the potential mechanisms regarding the prognostic ability of PLR are multifaceted and have not been clarified, research has demonstrated that platelets can produce inflammatory cytokines and chemokines which can lead to tumor progression.[32] Platelets promote tumor angiogenesis and stroma formation by secreting vascular endothelial growth factor and facilitating inflammatory cell migration.[33–35] IL-6 can stimulate the differentiation of megakaryocytes to platelets and participate in neutrophil recruitment.[36] Several studies have shown that IL-6 can stimulate thrombopoietin production and lead to increase in platelet counts in patients with cancer.[37] Lymphocytes play important roles in cell-mediated anti-tumor immune responses and tumor immunological surveillance.[38] Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are important components of the anti-tumor immune microenvironment and participate in several stages of tumor progression.[39,40] Thus, the prognostic impact of PLR may represent a balance between the tumor promotion functions and anti-tumor immune reactions.

Several limitations of this study should be considered. First, all included studies were carried out in China and more cohort studies from other regions are necessary to identify the common features in our findings. Hence, it is possible that our findings may not extend to other populations across the world. Additionally, this meta-analysis included a predominance of retrospective studies and lacked random control test studies; retrospective studies may provide confounding variables. Although our study has several limitations, it is the first and most comprehensive meta-analysis to systematically assess the prognostic value of PLR in patients with NPC. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because prognostic biomarkers are required for the proper management of patients with NPC to improve their outcomes. The meta-analysis provides a statistical inspection of scientific studies, and its evidence level is superior to the individual studies themselves. Our findings provide a potential new reliable tool for cancer control and will help mitigate the burden of this disease.

6. Conclusions

The results of the present study suggest that high pretreatment PLR is associated with poor OS and PFS in patients with NPC. As an easily accessible parameter, PLR provides a promising indicator for the prognostic evaluation of patients with NPC.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Data curation: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Formal analysis: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Investigation: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Methodology: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Project administration: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Resources: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Software: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Supervision: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Validation: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Visualization: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Writing – original draft: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Writing – review & editing: Rui-Xiang Cen, Yu-gang Li.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CAR = C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio, IMRT = intensity modulated radiotherapy, NLR = neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, NPC = nasopharyngeal carcinoma, OR = Odds ratio, OS = overall survival, PFS = progression-free survival, PLR = Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, TILs = Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

How to cite this article: Cen Rx, Li Yg. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a potential prognostic factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Medicine. 2019;98:38(e17176).

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

[1] Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 2016;387:1012–24. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[2] Lee AW, Ma BB, Ng WT, et al. Management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current practice and future perspective. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:3356–64. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[3] Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2012;104:286–93. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[4] Rottey S, Madani I, Deron P, et al. Modern treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current status and prospects. Curr Opin Oncol 2011;23:254–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[5] Smee RI, Meagher NS, Broadley K, et al. Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current management approaches. Am J Clin Oncol 2010;33:469–73. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[6] Xu T, Zhu G, He X, et al. A phase III randomized study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: updated long-term survival outcomes. Oral Oncol 2014;50:71–6. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[7] Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 2010;140:883–99. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[8] Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646–74. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[9] Nora I, Shridhar R, Huston J, et al. The accuracy of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a marker for gastrointestinal malignancies. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018;9:972–8. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[10] Phan TT, Ho TT, Nguyen HT, et al. The prognostic impact of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR TKI. Int J Gen Med 2018;11:423–30. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[11] Yang X, Liu H, He M, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of published literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e11574. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[12] Chen C, Sun P, Dai QS, et al. The Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts poor survival in cisplatin-based treated patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PloS one 2014;9:e112581. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[13] Li JP, Chen SL, Liu XM, et al. A novel inflammation-based stage (I Stage) predicts overall survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci V 17 2016;(11.): [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[14] Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–5. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[15] Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 1998;17:2815–34. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[16] Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, et al. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 2007;8:16. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[17] DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[18] Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[19] Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088–101. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[20] Jin L, Fu SB, Yu J. Effect of NLR and PLR from pre-treatment on prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Cancer Res Prev Treat 2017;44:476–80. [Google Scholar]
[21] Jiang R, Zou X, Hu W, et al. The elevated pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Tumour Biol 2015;36:7775–87. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[22] Li XH, Chang H, Xu BQ, et al. An inflammatory biomarker-based nomogram to predict prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of a prospective study. Cancer Med 2017;6:310–9. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[23] Sun W, Zhang L, Luo M, et al. Pretreatment hematologic markers as prognostic factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio. Head Neck 2016;38Suppl 1:E1332–40. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[24] Lu A, Li H, Zheng Y, et al. Prognostic significance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:3047802. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[25] Jiang Y, Qu S, Pan X, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and plateletto- lymphocyte ratio in intensity modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget 2018;9:9992–10004. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[26] Ye L, Oei RW, Kong F, et al. Prognostic values of hematological biomarkers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:1309–17. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[27] Sun P, Chen C, Xia Y, et al. The ratio of C-reactive protein/albumin is a novel inflammatory predictor of overall survival in cisplatin-based treated patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Dis Markers 2017;2017:6570808. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[28] Tang H, Wu W, Jin F, et al. Relationship of peripheral blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio with curative effect and prognosis of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: from a randomized prospective clinical trial. Cancer Res Prev Treat 2018;46:32–6. [Google Scholar]
[29] Jiang W, Chen Y, Huang J, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts the clinical outcome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Oncotarget 2017;8:66075–86. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[30] Palumbo JS, Degen JL. Mechanisms coupling the hemostatic system to colitis-associated cancer. Thromb Res 2010;125Suppl 2:S39–43. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[31] Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, et al. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008;454:436–44. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[32] Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 2001;357:539–45. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[33] Wakefield LM, Smith DM, Flanders KC, et al. Latent transforming growth factor-beta from human platelets. A high molecular weight complex containing precursor sequences. J Biol Chem 1988;263:7646–54. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[34] Gay LJ, Felding-Habermann B. Contribution of platelets to tumour metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:123–34. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[35] Banks RE, Forbes MA, Kinsey SE, et al. Release of the angiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from platelets: significance for VEGF measurements and cancer biology. Br J Cancer 1998;77:956–64. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[36] Lippitz BE. Cytokine patterns in patients with cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:e218–28. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[37] Klinger MH, Jelkmann W. Role of blood platelets in infection and inflammation. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2002;22:913–22. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[38] Bastid J, Bonnefoy N, Eliaou JF, et al. Lymphocyte-derived interleukin-17A adds another brick in the wall of inflammation-induced breast carcinogenesis. Oncoimmunology 2014;3:e28273. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[39] Chen KJ, Zhou L, Xie HY, et al. Intratumoral regulatory T cells alone or in combination with cytotoxic T cells predict prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. Med Oncol 2012;29:1817–26. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
[40] Zhou J, Ding T, Pan W, et al. Increased intratumoral regulatory T cells are related to intratumoral macrophages and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Int J Cancer 2009;125:1640–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017176

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics

3
Citations
Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Article citations

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.