Jun 24, 2003 ¡¤ In this article, three models to explain the LPF vote are tested; the socio-structural model, the protest vote model, and the policy voting model.
In this article, three models to explain the LPF vote are tested; the socio-structural model, the protest vote model, and the policy voting model.
In this article, three models to explain the LPF vote are tested; the socio-structural model, the protest vote model, and the policy voting model.
How the LPF Fuelled Discontent: Empirical tests of explanations of LPF support; Journal: Acta Politica; Volume | Issue number: 38 | 1; Pages (from-to): 89-106 ...
How the LPF Fuelled Discontent: Empirical tests of explanations of LPF support; Journal: Acta Politica; Volume | Issue number: 38 | 1; Pages (from-to): 89-106 ...
The purpose of this study was to examine the role of mental accounting, financial attitude, and financial self-efficacy on financial behavior. Furthermore, this ...
How the LPF fuelled discontent: Empirical tests of explanations of LPF support. W Van der Brug. Acta politica 38, 89-106, 2003. 267, 2003. The party as pariah ...
It has first been argued that the LPF brought a distinct issue profile to the electoral arena, which made it attractive for voters holding similar policy views.
The findings suggest that policy preferences and, to a lesser extent, attitudes of political discontent both contributed to the LPF vote, thus providing support ...
This article assesses the assumption that populist parties form an efficacious exhaust valve for voters, the channelling discontent thesis, as it is termed here ...