KJACR - Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration ...
journal.auric.kr › kjacr › XmlViewer
8. Lee Y. G., Wi H. S., Park J. I., Lee J. W., 2008, Study of cause analysis about fuel economy difference between Phase 1 and Phase 3 on the FRP-75 mode, ...
Apr 26, 2021 ， The test results show that the differences of fuel economy is ranging from 3.9% to 18.5%. Thefactors of the difference of fuel economy for ...
Missing: cause FRP- mode
Nov 26, 2018 ， In this study, we focused on the factor of causing change of fuel efficiency value, calculated according to how many environmental conditions that appear on ...
Aug 15, 2020 ， Energy flow analysis is an effective tool for refined development of vehicle to improve its energy efficiency. To reveal the energy-saving ...
The Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems (KERS) are being considered as promising short-range solution to improve the fuel economy of road vehicles.
What is the impact on ambient air qualiW' in major metro areas if a significant share of light mack gasoline engines are displaced by diesele?
Oct 19, 2016 ， Note that the Phase 3(c) scale is 10X lower than the Phase 1 scale (b). A similar trend was seen for all fuel/mode combinations.
Missing: cause | Show results with:cause
Feb 1, 2006 ， SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing changes to the test methods used to calculate the fuel economy estimates ...
Comparison of fuel consumption (FC) estimates derived by combining FRP and burned-area data. (a) Fuel consumption derived using SEVIRI FRP data.
a 0.66% increase in fuel economy for each 1% weight reduction and estimated fuel economy ... 3.2.1 Timing of Phase-In for Both Vehicular Emission Limits and Fuel.
Missing: FRP- | Show results with:FRP-